Julian Lim is one of the few constructors who consistently delight solvers with their innovative themes and brilliant grid designs. Today's themeless-like 72-worder is a good example. It's tricky to start with a 8-letter theme entry, as it automatically results in stacked 8's & 6's.
Julian has been published by the NY Times, LA Times, Fireball & The Chronicle of High Education. We're very lucky to have covered all of Julian's LA Times creations here at the corner. You can click here to view all of them.
Can you tell us a bit about your background? I sense a Malaysia/Singapore root from the spelling of your surname. It's often spelled as Lin & Lam in Chinese & Cantonese.
Julian has been published by the NY Times, LA Times, Fireball & The Chronicle of High Education. We're very lucky to have covered all of Julian's LA Times creations here at the corner. You can click here to view all of them.
Can you tell us a bit about your background? I sense a Malaysia/Singapore root from the spelling of your surname. It's often spelled as Lin & Lam in Chinese & Cantonese.
You're spot on -- I was born and went to school in Singapore. I then spent most of my 20s in the United States, first in college then grad school, before moving back home as a post-doc. My background is in psychology and neuroscience, and I work mostly with human brain imaging.
As far as I know, I'm the only regular American crossword constructor who lives in this neck of the woods. Crosswords puzzles aren't big here, but I'm trying to convert as many people as I can!
How did you get into crossword construction?
I
started doing cryptic puzzles when I was in my teens, and then switched
over to American-style puzzles (mostly the NYT) when I entered college.
I'd avoided American puzzles previously on the mistaken assumption that
they were "simple", and learned a sharp lesson when I first encountered
an NYT themeless.
I'm
not sure I can pinpoint the exact moment when I thought I'd try my hand
at constructing, but I think it was a desperate way to distract myself
from writing my dissertation. My first few grids took eternities to fill
-- I remember going to bed dreaming of black-and-white squares. I sent
some of those early puzzles to joon pahk, who had very nice things to
say about them, and after several rejections I had my first published
puzzle in the LAT, and in the NYT shortly after that.
How
would you describe your puzzle style? I always associate your name with
innovative idea, heavy theme & low word count.
I'm
not sure that I have a distinctive style in the way some other
constructors do. Perhaps one thing I do more often than others is have
theme entries cross in a 15x15 to allow for 6 theme answers to be used.
I've been able to get some pretty nice grids using that approach without
sacrificing fill quality. I do enjoy innovative themes, but hitting on
them is a chance and rare occurrence (usually happens when I'm in a
bar), so I will use more standard theme types if I can find an
interesting set of answers. I can also get a little *too* innovative at
times -- a few of my rejections for themed puzzles over the years have
basically been: "I don't get it". Perhaps I should start a website with a
compilation of themes editors didn't understand.
Which part do you enjoy the most in the construction process: theme development, filling or cluing?
Filling is the most fun part of the process for me. I like it especially because even after you reach the standard of producing publishable work you stilll get to raise the bar for yourself (using fewer partials, abbrvs. and so forth). One thing I've noticed is that I've developed a sort of sixth sense about how to make a grid that will fill in a tidy way, and that's made the process a lot less frustrating and more enjoyable as well.
I used to enjoy cluing a lot more when I first started out, but of course it gets harder and harder over time to clue the little repeaters, especially in early-week puzzles. It's also a little vexing to spend a long time coming up with a great clue only to have it edited out. Cluing themelesses is always a blast though.
You've made both themed and themeless puzzles. What are the major differences in your approach to fill?
Apart from the fact that themelesses obviously start from a glamor seed entry, really not that much. I fill many of my puzzles (both themed and
themeless) from the bottom right, with the exception of those that have
tightly constrained spots in the middle of the grid. I
think one difference might be that with themelesses I'll try several
different versions of a corner after finding one that's acceptable and
then pick my favorite, so it takes me several times longer to make a
themeless grid.
Besides crosswords, what are your other hobbies?
My hobbies have changed over the years. I used to be involved
in singing (both choral and a cappella) and duplicate bridge when I was
younger, but not so much nowadays. I like jogging and LesMills classes.
I also try and travel as much as I can.
